| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
experiencelifemag.com
Print › | Back ›
One Life, Indivisible
In a cultural context characterized by this sort of separation,
disassociation and alienation, what is a whole life, anyway?
By Pilar Gerasimo |
March 2008 |
Very often, when we are striving to
understand or make use of something
complex, we break it down into its component
parts and then
examine and
manipulate those parts in isolation.
This
technique has produced its fair share of scientific discoveries and
industrial breakthroughs (think of electricity, chemistry, the centrifuge,
pasteurization and the assembly-line process). But it has also caused its share
of harm and unanticipated side effects (think of petrochemicals, split atoms,
refined grains, and, well, the assembly-line process).
We’ve done this sort
of splitting apart in our daily lives, too. Post-agricultural, post-industrial
life is all about negotiating separations that our earliest ancestors never
struggled with — at least not in the same way. Nature vs. civilization. Work vs.
home. Sacred vs. secular. Personal vs. professional. Production vs. consumption.
To be sure, life in the time of our hunter-gatherer friends had its own
complexities and dangers. But it probably didn’t produce the sort of existential
dread and frenzy that many of us feel today as the result of having our time,
energy and instincts pulled in so many different directions.
What are we
supposed to make of a reality that has us coming home from long, bruising days
at work only to find we have virtually nothing left to offer the spouse and kids
for whom we’re supposedly “providing”?
What sense are we supposed to find in
a world where we work so many hours to afford our big, comfortable houses that
we have very little time to enjoy them? Where most of the “time-saving” products
we use every day are produced with chemicals that persistently poison the land,
water and air? Where medical science can prove that it’s the very nature of our
daily lives that’s making us chronically ill and unhappy, yet we’re encouraged to embrace drugs and surgical interventions that will allow us to continue
living precisely the same way?
I guess what I’m asking is this: In a cultural
context characterized by this sort of separation, disassociation and alienation,
what is a whole life, anyway?
The answer I keep coming up with is that we
know wholeness when we feel it. And we miss it terribly when we don’t. We are
fortunate, I think, to have a built-in sensing system that gives us constant,
albeit sometimes uncomfortable, feedback about how close (or how far) we are
from a state of thriving wholeness.
I was reading an interview with author
Michael Pollan the other day in which he said: “The health of our bodies is tied
to the health of the community and the health of the earth. Health is
indivisible.”
That stuck me as so right. I think it’s exciting to be living
in an era where so many of us are arriving at similar conclusions at the same
time. It’s also exciting to be living in an era where the tools and methods of
science and technology are rapidly confirming that it’s far more worthwhile to emulate nature’s integrated intelligence than to try to outsmart it.
Today,
some of our world’s best scientific minds are engaged in “biomimicry” projects:
studies and undertakings that imitate nature’s models, systems and processes to
solve problems in life-friendly ways — ways that are not only sustainable, but
often regenerative.
Nature cannot be well understood or well sustained, we’re
discovering, through separation, extraction, isolation or momentary analysis. In
nature, everything is connected, cyclical, open to change.
Clearly, our own
bodies and lives are part of this rubric and are subject to the same
nature-based principles: “Life creates conditions conducive to life,” those
principles teach us. “Life adapts and evolves.”
Slowly but surely, we’re
figuring it out: We accomplish more and create better results when we bring our
hearts and souls and healthy bodies to our jobs. Our hearts and souls and bodies
all do better when we spend plenty of time playing, loving, resting, reflecting
and enjoying nature. No individual, no community, no resource, no action or
reaction can really be considered “separate” from anything else.
This issue
of Experience Life is dedicated to the spirit of wholeness, balance and
integration. Here’s to being part of the big, indivisible picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Life, Indivisible
In a cultural context characterized by this sort of separation,
disassociation and alienation, what is a whole life, anyway?
By Pilar Gerasimo | Thoughts From the Editor, March 2008 |
Very often, when we are striving to
understand or make use of something
complex, we break it down into its component
parts and then
examine and
manipulate those parts in isolation.
This
technique has produced its fair share of scientific discoveries and
industrial breakthroughs (think of electricity, chemistry, the centrifuge,
pasteurization and the assembly-line process). But it has also caused its share
of harm and unanticipated side effects (think of petrochemicals, split atoms,
refined grains, and, well, the assembly-line process).
We’ve done this sort
of splitting apart in our daily lives, too. Post-agricultural, post-industrial
life is all about negotiating separations that our earliest ancestors never
struggled with — at least not in the same way. Nature vs. civilization. Work vs.
home. Sacred vs. secular. Personal vs. professional. Production vs. consumption.
To be sure, life in the time of our hunter-gatherer friends had its own
complexities and dangers. But it probably didn’t produce the sort of existential
dread and frenzy that many of us feel today as the result of having our time,
energy and instincts pulled in so many different directions.
What are we
supposed to make of a reality that has us coming home from long, bruising days
at work only to find we have virtually nothing left to offer the spouse and kids
for whom we’re supposedly “providing”?
What sense are we supposed to find in
a world where we work so many hours to afford our big, comfortable houses that
we have very little time to enjoy them? Where most of the “time-saving” products
we use every day are produced with chemicals that persistently poison the land,
water and air? Where medical science can prove that it’s the very nature of our
daily lives that’s making us chronically ill and unhappy, yet we’re encouraged to embrace drugs and surgical interventions that will allow us to continue
living precisely the same way?
I guess what I’m asking is this: In a cultural
context characterized by this sort of separation, disassociation and alienation,
what is a whole life, anyway?
The answer I keep coming up with is that we
know wholeness when we feel it. And we miss it terribly when we don’t. We are
fortunate, I think, to have a built-in sensing system that gives us constant,
albeit sometimes uncomfortable, feedback about how close (or how far) we are
from a state of thriving wholeness.
I was reading an interview with author
Michael Pollan the other day in which he said: “The health of our bodies is tied
to the health of the community and the health of the earth. Health is
indivisible.”
That stuck me as so right. I think it’s exciting to be living
in an era where so many of us are arriving at similar conclusions at the same
time. It’s also exciting to be living in an era where the tools and methods of
science and technology are rapidly confirming that it’s far more worthwhile to emulate nature’s integrated intelligence than to try to outsmart it.
Today,
some of our world’s best scientific minds are engaged in “biomimicry” projects:
studies and undertakings that imitate nature’s models, systems and processes to
solve problems in life-friendly ways — ways that are not only sustainable, but
often regenerative.
Nature cannot be well understood or well sustained, we’re
discovering, through separation, extraction, isolation or momentary analysis. In
nature, everything is connected, cyclical, open to change.
Clearly, our own
bodies and lives are part of this rubric and are subject to the same
nature-based principles: “Life creates conditions conducive to life,” those
principles teach us. “Life adapts and evolves.”
Slowly but surely, we’re
figuring it out: We accomplish more and create better results when we bring our
hearts and souls and healthy bodies to our jobs. Our hearts and souls and bodies
all do better when we spend plenty of time playing, loving, resting, reflecting
and enjoying nature. No individual, no community, no resource, no action or
reaction can really be considered “separate” from anything else.
This issue
of Experience Life is dedicated to the spirit of wholeness, balance and
integration. Here’s to being part of the big, indivisible picture.
Print
| Email
| Comment
| Subscribe
| Give a Gift
|
|