| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
experiencelifemag.com
Print › | Back ›
The Way I Hear It
In an era where calls for personal responsibility are becoming more
popular, I would love to hear our President and elected
officials call
on Americans to lay off the burgers, sodas, fries, white
bread and cheese dip
and get out for a morning walk or evening yoga
class.
By Pilar Gerasimo |
May 2009 |
I listen to the radio a lot on my way to and from work — public radio mostly,
where the topic of healthcare reform has been a hot item of late. I’ve heard
an endless parade of different viewpoints on the matter, from legislators,
doctors and policy wonks of all stripes. But there’s one radio moment that keeps
repeating itself like a bad case of déja vu, and it is driving me crazy. It
goes something like this: Host: So, Mr. or Ms. Healthcare Expert, in the big
debate about how to hold down healthcare costs, we’re hearing a lot about
chronic disease and the importance of prevention. What does prevention involve,
exactly, and what role does it play in resolving this crisis? Expert:
Preventive medicine is very important and it has to be a part of any meaningful
attempt to control costs. (Expert then launches into a whole spiel on regular
exams and screenings, early intervention, vaccinations, flu shots, blah blah
blah.) Host: Thanks for that explanation, Mr. Expert. We’ve got Informed
Caller from Anycity, USA, on the line with a question. Go ahead,
Informed. Caller: I get what your expert is saying, but given that most
chronic diseases are lifestyle related, don’t we also need to focus on educating
people about the dangers of the Standard American Diet and being too sedentary?
Don’t we need to put some policy and public-education emphasis on actually
changing people’s behavior, providing incentives, and helping them take some
responsibility for keeping themselves healthy? Expert: The caller makes a
good point. Of course we want to see people eating better and exercising more,
but getting people to change their behavior is really difficult. Americans want
to be free to eat what they please and do what they like, and most doctors don’t
really feel it’s their place to interfere with their patients’ personal choices. Host: Indeed. Well moving on, Mr. Expert, let’s talk a little about the
pros and cons of this single-payer system that everyone’s talking about . .
. And that’s that. Inside of 30 seconds we’ve gotten an abridged dialogue
that pretty well represents the current, conventional thinking in both medicine
and government circles. The ultimate 3-trillion-dollar question is posed (and
inevitably, in radio at least, it always seems to come from an average-person
caller): Don’t we need to start focusing on getting people to change their
habits and take more personal responsibility for their health? And then the
brief, inevitable answer lands with a thud: Yes, but getting people to change is
difficult, so let’s just move on. At moments like these, it’s all I can do to
keep from knocking my head repeatedly on the steering wheel. “So we’re not
doing it because it’s difficult?” I say to myself. “Difficult like winning our
independence from Britain, or securing voting rights for women and people of
color, or flying to the moon? Difficult in some way that having a huge
population suffering miserably from obesity, diabetes and cancer
isn’t?” Seriously, can our so-called experts really believe that convincing a
large sector of the population to make changes in the way they eat and exercise
will be anywhere near as daunting as continuing to deal with the effects of not
doing so? In an era where calls for personal responsibility are becoming more
popular, I, for one, would love to hear our President and elected officials call
on Americans to lay off the burgers, sodas, fries, white bread and cheese dip
and get out for a morning walk or evening yoga class. I’d love to hear
experts debating what kinds of subsidies, tax deductions, grants, initiatives
and education efforts will have the best healthy-choice-supporting effects.
And I’d particularly love to hear an expert on the radio saying, “Yes, the
caller is right, and we should really devote another hour or two to talking
about this, because until more Americans get the encouragement and education
they need to begin living healthier lifestyles, no amount of tinkering with our
healthcare system is going to solve the problem.” While I await that day, I
satisfy myself with the evidence of progress — like watching Dr. Mark Hyman,
Dr. Mehmet Oz, Dr. Andrew Weil and Dr. Dean Ornish testify before the
U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions about how
supporting healthy lifestyle change must become a top policy priority. You can
grab a link to video of that hearing here (just search
on “senate hearing”) if you want to see it for yourself. In the meantime, I
hope you’ll enjoy this issue, which we dedicate to motivated health seekers
everywhere — and to the many health-supporting things they do quite happily each
and every day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Way I Hear It
In an era where calls for personal responsibility are becoming more
popular, I would love to hear our President and elected
officials call
on Americans to lay off the burgers, sodas, fries, white
bread and cheese dip
and get out for a morning walk or evening yoga
class.
By Pilar Gerasimo | Thoughts From the Editor, May 2009 |
I listen to the radio a lot on my way to and from work — public radio mostly,
where the topic of healthcare reform has been a hot item of late. I’ve heard
an endless parade of different viewpoints on the matter, from legislators,
doctors and policy wonks of all stripes. But there’s one radio moment that keeps
repeating itself like a bad case of déja vu, and it is driving me crazy. It
goes something like this: Host: So, Mr. or Ms. Healthcare Expert, in the big
debate about how to hold down healthcare costs, we’re hearing a lot about
chronic disease and the importance of prevention. What does prevention involve,
exactly, and what role does it play in resolving this crisis? Expert:
Preventive medicine is very important and it has to be a part of any meaningful
attempt to control costs. (Expert then launches into a whole spiel on regular
exams and screenings, early intervention, vaccinations, flu shots, blah blah
blah.) Host: Thanks for that explanation, Mr. Expert. We’ve got Informed
Caller from Anycity, USA, on the line with a question. Go ahead,
Informed. Caller: I get what your expert is saying, but given that most
chronic diseases are lifestyle related, don’t we also need to focus on educating
people about the dangers of the Standard American Diet and being too sedentary?
Don’t we need to put some policy and public-education emphasis on actually
changing people’s behavior, providing incentives, and helping them take some
responsibility for keeping themselves healthy? Expert: The caller makes a
good point. Of course we want to see people eating better and exercising more,
but getting people to change their behavior is really difficult. Americans want
to be free to eat what they please and do what they like, and most doctors don’t
really feel it’s their place to interfere with their patients’ personal choices. Host: Indeed. Well moving on, Mr. Expert, let’s talk a little about the
pros and cons of this single-payer system that everyone’s talking about . .
. And that’s that. Inside of 30 seconds we’ve gotten an abridged dialogue
that pretty well represents the current, conventional thinking in both medicine
and government circles. The ultimate 3-trillion-dollar question is posed (and
inevitably, in radio at least, it always seems to come from an average-person
caller): Don’t we need to start focusing on getting people to change their
habits and take more personal responsibility for their health? And then the
brief, inevitable answer lands with a thud: Yes, but getting people to change is
difficult, so let’s just move on. At moments like these, it’s all I can do to
keep from knocking my head repeatedly on the steering wheel. “So we’re not
doing it because it’s difficult?” I say to myself. “Difficult like winning our
independence from Britain, or securing voting rights for women and people of
color, or flying to the moon? Difficult in some way that having a huge
population suffering miserably from obesity, diabetes and cancer
isn’t?” Seriously, can our so-called experts really believe that convincing a
large sector of the population to make changes in the way they eat and exercise
will be anywhere near as daunting as continuing to deal with the effects of not
doing so? In an era where calls for personal responsibility are becoming more
popular, I, for one, would love to hear our President and elected officials call
on Americans to lay off the burgers, sodas, fries, white bread and cheese dip
and get out for a morning walk or evening yoga class. I’d love to hear
experts debating what kinds of subsidies, tax deductions, grants, initiatives
and education efforts will have the best healthy-choice-supporting effects.
And I’d particularly love to hear an expert on the radio saying, “Yes, the
caller is right, and we should really devote another hour or two to talking
about this, because until more Americans get the encouragement and education
they need to begin living healthier lifestyles, no amount of tinkering with our
healthcare system is going to solve the problem.” While I await that day, I
satisfy myself with the evidence of progress — like watching Dr. Mark Hyman,
Dr. Mehmet Oz, Dr. Andrew Weil and Dr. Dean Ornish testify before the
U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions about how
supporting healthy lifestyle change must become a top policy priority. You can
grab a link to video of that hearing here (just search
on “senate hearing”) if you want to see it for yourself. In the meantime, I
hope you’ll enjoy this issue, which we dedicate to motivated health seekers
everywhere — and to the many health-supporting things they do quite happily each
and every day.
Print
| Email
| Comment
| Subscribe
| Give a Gift
|
|